U.S. internet control hangs in the balance

Next week there will be a meeting in Brazil that is supposed to cover topics like spam, free speech and cheaper access. It is starting to look like it will be more of a debate over U.S. control over the internet!

The four day forum is comprised of over 2,000 representatives from government, business and "civil society", with the key theme being how to bring the internet to the next billion people.

The Internet Governance Forum is the result of a compromise world leaders reached at a U.N. summit in Tunisia two years ago. They agreed to let the United States remain in charge.

But they established an annual forum to discuss emerging issues, including whether control of how Internet addresses are assigned—and thus how people use the Internet—should remain with the U.S. government and an American nonprofit.

Many countries complained U.S. dominance wasn't discussed enough during the first forum last year, in Athens. In meetings leading to the second round opening in Rio de Janeiro, China, Iran, Russia and Brazil, among others, won an opening-day panel devoted to "critical Internet resources." Iran!???

Some governments are seeking more concrete results, such as a chairman's statement or negotiated agreement on next steps, though U.S. and U.N. leaders cautioned that specific decisions are unlikely and even inappropriate.

"If last year was viewed as a trial run, this year is in a sense a bit more important," said a law professor at the University of Ottawa in Canada. "If little comes out of this, I think there will be growing concern that the IGF is little more than a talk shop and a place to meet."

Some governments, particularly in developing countries, sought to strip the United States of its oversight so they could have more say over such policies as domain names in languages other than English.

It will be interesting to see what, if anything comes as a result of the Internet Governance Forum.